NEW BOOK - DARWIN, THE SATANIC EVOLUTION PROJECT BY SATCHIDANAND
The Christians are not wrong: the Satanic Atlantis-Phoenician Black Nobility really ARE trying to wipe Christians out!
NEW BOOK - DARWIN, THE SATANIC EVOLUTION PROJECT BY SATCHIDANAND
PREFACE… DARWIN THE SATANIC EVOLUTION PROJECT
1. Darwin didn’t sail anywhere, his team bought the collections of other naturalists.
2. Darwin didn’t write any books or Theories of Evolution, his team wrote them for him..
3. Darwins Theories of Evolution were Satanic, created by the Satanic Atlantis-Phoenician Black Nobility to deny God!
4. How Mill, Huxley, Bentham, Molesworth and others prepared the ground for Darwin’s Satanic Theories
5. VOX DAY HAS PROVED IT’S NOT THE DNA
Probability Zero: The Mathematical Impossibility of Evolution by Natural Selection
by Vox Day (Author), Frank J. Tipler (Foreword)
6. MILES MATHIS SUGGESTS IT’S NOT THE DNA, IT’S NOT THE GENETICS, IT’S EPIGENETICS AND THE CHARGE FIELD!!
What if the story of Darwin was never what we were told?
This book challenges the official narrative of evolutionary theory and examines the hidden forces that shaped modern scientific belief.
Inside, the reader will explore:
The Darwin Myth — Evidence suggesting Darwin did not personally conduct the famous voyages or collections attributed to him, relying instead on acquired work from other naturalists.
Authorship in Question — An investigation into claims that Darwin’s books and evolutionary theories were produced by a network of collaborators rather than by Darwin alone.
Theological Subversion — An argument that evolutionary theory was engineered as a materialist doctrine designed to sever science from God, rooted in ancient elite power structures often described as Atlantean-Phoenician or Black Nobility traditions.
Manufacturing Consensus — How figures such as Mill, Huxley, Bentham, Molesworth, and others prepared the intellectual and cultural ground for Darwinism’s acceptance.
Beyond DNA — Analysis of critiques, including Vox Day’s work, questioning DNA as the primary driver of evolution.
The Charge Field Hypothesis — Drawing on Miles Mathis’ research, this book proposes that epigenetics and energetic charge fields—not genetics alone—may be the true engines of biological change.
A controversial re-examination of evolution, power, and belief—challenging readers to question the foundations of modern science itself.
Here’s something else we learn from reading the history of the time. Dozens and dozens of other “gentlemen naturalists” were busy in those years, so many the specimens were stacking up all over the country, overflowing the museums and filling sheds and warehouses. Many were being neglected, since there wasn’t room for them.
So there was really no need for Darwin to have bothered with his own five-year voyage, which was quite dangerous, especially that rounding the Horn in winter business – so he didn’t! It was all a Fake!
All he needed to do is use his Daddy’s money to buy up a bunch of neglected collections from other gentlemen naturalists, who were already on edge about their collections getting trashed or eaten by bugs. Most of them admit they were in it for the money—see comments about McCormick in the Beagle literature. We touched on him below. They would be easy to buy off, and for the right price they would keep silent to the grave. We are about to see Wallace take an inexplicable dive for Darwin, and other lesser “scientists” would no doubt fold for even lower prices.
British zoologists at the time had a huge backlog of work, due to natural history collecting being encouraged throughout the British Empire, and there was a danger of specimens just being left in storage.[80]
Suggestive, ain’t it, especially in light of what we have just discovered. Unlike the other gentlemen naturalists whose specimens were rotting in storage, Darwin’s specimens in all categories were immediately snapped up by top people all over Britain, with Darwin himself being feted as a celebrity at age 27.
So why was Darwin being so noisily promoted while everyone else was being ignored? We now know it was because he was a Stuart, but it was more than that. He was a Satanic Atlantis-Phoenician Project, and all these other people like Lyell, Henslow, Gould and Owen were in on it. So were the Dukes, who we have seen were pulling the strings behind this whole thing. The Treasury itself got involved, investing £120,000 in the Darwin project.
All the writing, editing, cataloging, publishing, and theorizing was being done by others behind the scenes, while Darwin drove around collecting awards for sailing to Tenerife and back.
So I would say the 2nd voyage of the Beagle has now been proved to be a myth. I could continue beating this horse, but it is already so dead it is fossilized. We could carbon-date it. It has joined the Titanic fake story in Davy Jones’ locker.
It looks like there will be a part III, since I haven’t even got Darwin up to age 30. But I may take a break and come back to it, since I am feeling especially slimed by this entire project. I didn’t see it coming in so it took me somewhat by surprise. I knew there was dirt on Darwin, but nothing like this.
Given what we have discovered about Darwin, we see that Wallace must have been the same sort of fraud. And indeed his Wikipedia page confirms it, since a close reading explodes it into little pieces, as usual. Wallace went straight there.
But we now know why he did. It wasn’t to collect bugs. It was because he was a close cousin of these coal billionaires, including the Walkers, and as a rich young man he wanted to tag along for the fun. He wasn’t the sort to hang out at the club, read the newspapers, and fritter away his inheritance on gambling. He was an energetic, talkative sort who liked to be on the go with the big boys, and they apparently found him good company. I doubt it was for any actual skills he had, other than BJs, but skills didn’t count in that crowd.
The lack of all scruples counted first, then the ability to lie and keep secrets, then—for Wallace’s type—the ability to look good in a tight waistcoat and yellow pants. I now think that was Wallace’s main function all along. As it is for so many of these people.
Nothing particularly wrong with that, you will say, and I will concede that. It takes all sorts and that wasn’t the worst trait in that list. I am not here to out him in that way, I am here to out him as another in a long list of prominent frauds, who faked their entire resumes and did almost nothing you are told they did.
As a not unimportant aside, this was Borneo, and it is when the Orangutans were almost wiped out, since they were considered a danger to workers. Wallace personally shot and procured as many Orangutan specimens as he could, since they were among the most valuable. Meaning he murdered them in cold blood, for nothing other than profit. He also liked to shoot and eat monkeys. So when you think naturalist, don’t imagine they are animal lovers.
Typical Phoenician behavior.
When I say I didn’t come to this as a Christian, I mean evolution never offended me on those terms. I knew it was embryonic, but thought it was a step more scientific than “God created the Earth in six days”. I was never too attached to the creation myth in the Bible, or any other creation myths for that matter. My mind was open and still is. I don’t think anyone knows how anything was created. I don’t think we are even close to being able to know. Our understanding of such things is about a half-step up from that of a dog (notice I don’t say of an ape).
Plus, I never understood how evolution and Christianity were in opposition. I didn’t understand it from the beginning, when I first learned of it as a kid, and I am no better off now. Science and religion don’t seem to me to have much cross-over. They don’t compete. As I said in a previous paper, even if Evolution were completely true, it wouldn’t explain anything about creation. It isn’t a theory of creation. It has nothing to say about how the Earth or Heavens were created. You could easily have both God (including Jesus, if you like) and evolution, since God could have chosen to create things that way. We just don’t know. We didn’t know in 1850 and we are no closer to knowing now, after 174 years of natural selection. So all the bickering and division seemed manufactured to me back then, and it seems ten times as manufactured to me now, knowing what I now know.
And what do I know? I know that the Satanic Atlantis-Phoenician Black Nobility people we have been uncloaking are masters of manufacturing division and always have been. It is their modus operandi, and they are doing it on purpose across the board, not just here. They want us fighting and spend half their time making up new factions. The other half of the time they are lying.
I have also discovered the Christians are not wrong: the Satanic Atlantis-Phoenician Black Nobility really ARE trying to wipe Christians out, though maybe not for the reasons they think. Before we ever got to this question of Darwin and Evolution, we have seen piles of evidence over centuries that the rulers had decided to phase out all religions, not just Christianity, first because they are members of the Satanic Religion and second that other Religions were getting in the way of trade (with rules against usury, etc.), and later because it had been consciously decided to secularize all government.
The State wanted the Church’s tithe, for one thing, but it also wanted to streamline world governance, turning the old State/Church duopoly into the new State monopoly. It would start by stealing all Church property, as with Henry VIII taking all the monasteries and the French Revolution absorbing the First Estate (the Church) into the Second (the bankers/merchants). But it would end where we are now, nearing a totally secularized and propagandized world, of the Orwell sort, where the State brooks no opposition and takes everything for itself.
This is why we see Evolution rising in such unnecessary conflict. These scientists in 1850 could have tried to promote their ideas diplomatically, avoiding as far as possible attacking the Church head-on, but for some reason they did the opposite. They manufactured schism even where it didn’t exist, as in this idea that Evolution was a competing theory of creation. We saw them do it later with DNA, implying that DNA was somehow a replacement for God or religion. When it is no such thing. I definitely believe in DNA. What I don’t believe is that it explains how things are. It is nothing more than a genetic code, and that doesn’t tell us much about anything, such as how it got there or how we got here. It is the same with Evolution, which—even if true—is extremely limited in its explanatory power. Evolution, DNA, and all the rest of contemporary science put together are only the first steps to understanding who we are and why we are here (supposing there is an answer to that question beyond IT IS).
So I am now able to fit Darwin and Evolution into this greater and older scheme.
How Satanic Atlantis-Phoenician Empire Agents, Mill, Huxley, Bentham, Molesworth and others prepared the ground for Darwin’s Satanic Theories
So, let’s remind ourselves: Huxley, who quit school at age ten after two years of schooling, was given a bye into the Navy, was given a bye into his professorship, and then somehow became President of the Royal Society and Privy Councillor.
