"A Citizen has the courage to make the safety of the whole human race his personal responsibility" Robert Heinlein, Starship Troopers 1hr 38mins
Understand, the 2000 Trillion Dollar Rothschilds and Rockefellers Rule!! and have ruled, as Devil Worshipping, Human Sacrificing, Phoenician Families, for 10,000 years.
In the process of the conscious Great Reset destruction of the Anglo-American Empire and the move to the Chinese Century came the insertion of Pedo Joe in a fake election which should have elected Trump.
What Devil Worshipper Pedo “Joe Biden” actually accomplished in office was the near-total wrecking of the USA. His stopping of Petroleum Pipelines and drilling increased the price of Petrol, Fertilizers, Food… Created Inflation. He torpedoed the authority and legitimacy of just about every federal agency, turned the Department of Justice into a Gestapo, seeded the federal court benches with Woke lunatics, created totalitarian censorship in the media, allowed an invasion of perhaps 45-million border-jumpers (including many thousands of professional terrorists), coerced deathvaxx injections of an ineffective and injurious vaccine into millions of citizens afraid of losing their livelihoods, promoted gross medical experiments on sexually troubled children, invited drag queens and mentally-ill degenerates to cavort in the White House, spent borrowed money at a rate that propelled the national debt past the event horizon into a black hole, made the seeking of incompetence the number one priority of the Pentagon, provoked a war in Ukraine that now teeters on the hazard of WW3 and a nuclear exchange, and allowed the CIA to complete its takeover of the US government that has even tried to assassinate Trump and now even Pedo Joe has, "Disappeared" to be replaced by Giant Joe and Idiot Puppet Kamala .
“Joe Biden” will go down in history as the worst of all 46 US presidents
AGAINST SATANISM VOLUME 6 -Infiltrating 2000 Trillion Dollar Bloodline Phoenician/Jewish Aristocratic Families
The Satanic History of the World Part 2 Published May 2019
Dark Forces have used Infiltrating Bloodline Phoenician/Jewish aristocratic Families which have existed for over 10,000 years before the Birth of Christ. Using emotional rhetorical religious concepts to control humanity, they themselves worship all the Pagan Gods, including Lucifer, Satan, Baal, Bel, Molech, Ashtoreth, Cybele and Attis and Sabbatean Frankism,
The Illuminati, 33rd Degree Freemasons, Jesuits, Aleister Crowley Sodomy Rituals in the OTO with Satanic Rituals like Human Sacrifice as their Empires, Roman and Carthaginian, did before.
In this book we find that over thousands of years, spook, 2000 Trillion Dollar - Really, really, Rich Bloodline Phoenician/Jewish aristocratic Families infiltrated every country, every Empire, taking over or infiltrating every ruling aristocracy and aristocratic, bloodline family, in Europe, Britain, America, India, China and in every other country in the World, putting Mind controlled Sodomy and Satanism created Psychopaths like Pedo Joe Biden in every position for total control.
Satchidanand’s Against Satanism Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Against Satanism by Satchidanand Volumes 1-12 - “The Occulted Satanic History of the World” - Your Worldview Will Never Be the Same! - in an easily downloadable file from our own website.
Satanic Spiritual Movie Reviews by Satchidanand Volumes One - “Blacklisted” and Two “AI and Transhumanism” in an easily downloadable file from our own website.
For the past couple of years I have been getting emails on Tartaria or Khazaria, asking what I thought of these theories. Although they are separate theories (mostly), I lump them in here for a reason. I will show that they can be dismissed as variants of the same misdirection.
The Khazars theory came first, and it goes all the way back to around 1800, when Rabbi Levinsohn and Johann Ewers pushed it for a few years. That is your first clue: it is and always has been promulgated by Jews. The idea is that the Ashkenazi came from Khazars in southern Russia in the 8 th c. AD. Although it is true the Khazarian leaders were “converted” to Judaism at that time, it doesn't mean the Ashkenazi came from them. As I have shown you, the more likely answer is that area was taken over by Phoenicians/Jews in that period, through trade and intermarriage.
So it wasn't a conversion, it was an infiltration and subversion. But large parts of the world could say the same. The Phoenicians had been taking over the world for 3,000 years by that time, and were covertly conquering large parts of Europe and Asia in those millennia. So to claim that a major sect of Jews came from a particular location like Khazaria is misdirection. It is misdirection, because the Jews pushing this theory want to point you to everywhere except the right spot. They need to divert you away from the right answer, which is that the Jews came from the same place the Phoenicians came from: Canaan, Phoenicia, or Jerusalem. The Jews don't want you to realize they are equivalent to the Phoenicians, because that would destroy all their stories of victimhood.
[Added April 18, 2021: This also ties into the claim that modern Jews are not Israelites. Every time I run a paper touching on the subject, I get emails from people telling me these people I am calling Jews aren't the Jews of the Bible. For years I have been ignoring these people, intuiting it was a scam by the Jews themselves, but I finally looked into it. The claim is that modern Jews come from the Khazars, who weren't Israelites because they didn't come from the line of Jacob. Jacob was also called Israel, and that is where the name Israelites comes from. But if we look closer, this theory admits the Khazars were Edomites, which means they came from the line of Esau, brother of Jacob. But since they are twin brothers and grandsons of Abraham, the theory completely falls apart.
I will be told Edom became an enemy nation against Israel, but that doesn't change any bloodlines. The question is one of bloodlines, not disagreements or nations. The only merit the theory has is that it explains where the red-haired line of the modern Jews comes from. Esau means “red”, and he was supposed to have flaming red hair. It confirms the Biblical story as true history, at least in this particular, since the Edomites and Khazars did and do have many red-haired members. We may assume the red hair in the British Isles came from the same place, as the Edomites became the Vikings became the Scots/Irish lines.
Well, it has merit in one other way: it explains the dishonesty inherent in Jacob's line, since Jacob is famous for stealing by trickery Esau's birthright as first born. This dishonesty comes through the female line, since the idea of the trick comes from their mother Rebecca. Jacob is then cheated by his uncle, so we are not sure why the Israelis are so proud of their past. Also never explained is why Isaac or God allowed this deception by Rebecca and Jacob to stand. God himself seems unjust. The entire nation of Israel is therefore built upon deception and trickery, and the disinclination of God to set it right. Knowing of the deception, God nonetheless confirms his renaming of Jacob as Israel.]
Historians and archaeologists admit the Jews and Phoenicians come from the same place and have the same language, so they really have to jump through hoops to prevent you from making the obvious connection. They have to make you think the Phoenicians crashed and burned completely at the time the Jews (Twelve Tribes) were arising, and that after that the Jews were the constant punching bags of the Egyptians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Persians, etc. When the truth is, Phoenicia never crashed. Phoenicia was an extension of Egypt, and was behind both Persia and Babylon. It was also behind Mycenae, Crete, Greece, and Macedonia.
The Phoenicians were also behind the Khazars and Tartars, so that is the only way those theories are true. But the promoters of those theories don't admit that, of course. They want your eyes off that as much as possible, because the purpose of the new theories is to make you think the Phoenicians/Jews are still marginalized. They want you to think the Phoenicians are extinct and that the Jews are small, struggling populations descended from lost races like the Tartars or minor historical people like the Khazars. When the truth is, the Phoenicians/Jews now own/run the entire world.
They are the 2000 Trillion Dollar Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Warburgs and Schiffs and thousands more merchants and bankers behind every government in the world.
I have shown you the genealogies that prove this beyond a doubt, and you should have known it just by studying these people's names and faces. It is that obvious. But they have taught you not to trust your eyes and not to ask any questions.
You see how Tartaria is just a variant of Khazaria. Although promoted heavily by Arthur Koestler and his people back in the 1970s, the Khazaria theory never really took hold. So when my numbers started going viral in the past five years, the governors could see they needed another project of misdirection and they needed it fast. Tartaria came out of nowhere in about 2018 and has been promoted heavily at all the usual places, including Youtube. See Max Igan promoting it there right now. He is Jewish of course.
At the same time, several other similar projects have also gone into overdrive, including the theory that the British Isles were founded by Sephardic Jews, but that Sephardic Jews are converts and therefore not really Jews by blood. See When Scotland was Jewish for the spearhead of that theory. On the flipside, we have the theory that Ashkenazi are not really Jews by blood. The Khazar theory plays into that one as well, since if the Ashkenazi came from Khazars, they are again converts, and therefore not really Jews. Someone badly wants you to believe that all modern Jewish people are not really Jews.
I have been told, “Well, you are misdirecting in the same way, telling us Jews are really Phoenicians. Isn't that the same project with a different spin?” Nope, since in my theory Jews and Phoenicians are just two names for the same people, but they have the same bloodlines regardless. There was no conversion or takeover, just a name change. No misdirection is going on, since I am not pointing away from the Jews in any way. My theory doesn't diminish their blame in any way, it increases it, because you can see exactly who they are and what they have done. And how and why as well. The Jewish lie has gotten much much bigger by tying it to the Phoenician lie, you see. Which is precisely why all these people promoting Khazaria and Tartaria stay as far away from me as possible. If I were really promoting a variant of their theories, they would quote me all the time. As it is, they pretend I don't exist.
You will say, “If that is true, then why do we see these people and countries fighting each other throughout history? If the Phoenicians now own the world and always have, why all the conflict?” Two answers: one, a lot of that conflict was manufactured, as I have shown. It was either made up from nothing on paper, to cover the real events of the time; or the wars were manufactured (and were partly real) to generate profit. Wars allowed for the efficient movement of wealth and populations, and provided excuses for many events that would otherwise be difficult to manage. Just like now.
People can be made to do things in wartime they wouldn't consider doing in times of peace. Two, in the past, the Phoenicians were not completely cohesive or coherent. The world was large enough to allow for many splits, and some families took over one area while others took over other areas. At first these areas were separated, but as populations grew, the areas met one another. So you had Family versus Family. We saw that most recently in my paper on Jefferson, where we saw the Dutch East India Company fighting the British East India Company for control of the Americas. That was Phoenicians versus Phoenicians. It actually had little or nothing to do with colonists or Kings.
Another small point on which the new theorists are accidentally right is the Tartaria theory claim that the Mongols or Golden Horde people have changed in their historical portraits. The Khans are now drawn as looking like Orientals, with slanted eyes, so we connect them in our minds to China. But in the past, they were drawn looking European, or even Jewish, with light hair or long noses. The first portrait above is the one most people know as Genghis, but it came from centuries later, and is obviously just a Chinese portrait mistagged as Genghis. The second is from even later, and there he has been made to look Indian or Arabic. However, most of the oldest paintings and drawings of the Khans (including Batu Khan and Tamerlane** or Timur Khan) don't look anything like that.
So there is definitely misdirection going on here, but not the misdirection they want you to think. The Jews pushing this theory should never have gone there, because it points directly at my theories. I have shown you the Cohens have been the big winners in the Phoenician Navy battles for supremacy. They were formerly Comyns, Komnenes (from Armenia), and they are also. . . Kahns and Khans.
Genghis Khan was really Genghis Komnene or Genghis Cohen. The last thing the new theorists want you to realize.
We are supposed to believe that Genghis Khan is a title, not a name. We are told his real name was Temujin, meaning “iron”, and that his title Genghis Khan meant “universal ruler”. But that looks like the usual fudge to me. Clearly, Temujin was his nickname—kind of like “Stalin”, which means “steel”. Stalin wasn't Stalin's real name, you know. So we still have the name Genghis Khan to explain. No doubt Khan did come to mean ruler, but only later. It was originally Komnene or Cohen. A similar thing happened in Israel, of course, where Kohen came to mean “of the highest priestly class”. But that was because Komnenes/Kohens had always filled those positions.
So where does Genghis come from? My guess is it is just a localization of “George”. Both probably come from Ge, meaning Earth. Which means Genghis Khan is just George Cohen. Bet you never thought of that.
Once you realize this, you will find a lot of other obvious Jewish/Phoenician names in the “Mongolian” lists. Such as? Such as Naiman. We are told it is Mongolian for eight, and that the Naiman were a tribe of the Kazakh nation, being either Nestorian Christians or Buddhists. Right. Anyway, we know they were in the early bloodlines of the Khans, since the mainstream admits it. Here are some more clues: the Naiman came from the west, and they actually outnumbered Mongols in the Mongol Empire in the 1200s. But they couldn't have been Phoenicians/Jews coming from the direction of Armenia, right? Naiman couldn't link us forward to Neiman, as in Neiman-Marcus, could it? That's right, the “Mongols” still run Dallas, TX, 800 years later. Which could be why a guy hiding behind the handle KorbenDallas* is the one that is most prominently pushing this Tartaria theory online.
We are taught that the current Jewish surname Neiman/Naiman comes from the German Neumann, but that is just another fudge. The Jews are no doubt happy to maintain the conflation and confusion. But the name Naiman was around long before. We are taught that the Mongols conquered the Naiman, but that is a reversal. The Naiman conquered the local peoples of that region via trade and intermarriage, as usual, and created a story to cover it later.
And where does the name Naiman really come from? This is so easy. It is one of the Twelve Tribes, of course. Naaman (meaning “pleasant” or “graceful”) was one of the sons of Benjamin. Hundreds of years later there was another famous Naaman, commander of the armies of Ben-Hadad II. The name Naaman is the same in Urdu and Arabic, where it means the same thing. So that is where the Naiman in Mongolia came from, as well as the Naiman/Neiman now. Not from Neumann, but from Naaman, the son of Benjamin.
Genghis' son was named Jochi. Hmmm. That couldn't be the same as Jacob, could it? They were of the house of Borjigin. Hmmm. That couldn't be the same as Borgia, could it? No link to the Bourbons, surely? They admit these Borjigins ruled Mongolia (north of China) until the 20th century. They also ruled Crimea until 1783. The last Khan of Crimea was Sahin Giray.
Hmmm. Sahin is a Jewish name, so that couldn't be the same as Sahin Gray, could it? No relation to the Grays/Greys of the British peerage, right? Giray studied in Greece and Venice. He spoke Italian and Greek. Catherine the Great took the time to point out in a famous letter that Giray was circumcised. What could it mean? He was preceded by his cousin Selim III Giray. But Selim can't be the same as Solomon, could it? No, that would be too easy.
As you are seeing, we are finding our Jews in turbans going back to the 12th century. We have recently caught them pretending to be Christians or Muslims, and we now see they have doing it for almost a thousand years.
Another thing that points at my theory, not theirs, is the flags we find:
They tell us that is supposed to be proof Tartaria was an independent nation, not just a general term for western Asia. Which is true in a way. We are being given clues here, but not the clues they think. We have a Griffon/Phoenix and an Owl here. . . Oh, what could it mean? The owl appears on many Phoenician coins, since it was their symbol before it was borrowed by Athena and the Greeks.
Those implements behind the owl are the crook and flail of Egypt, confirming the link between Egypt and Phoenicia. By the way, you can get one of those coins on Ebay if you want one. A real one.
If you want to know what the owl meant to the Phoenicians, it isn't hidden. Both the Greeks and the Vikings were Phoenicians, and we know they both held the owl to be a symbol of wisdom. But the owl is of course also the most covert hunter, gliding silently through the darkness. So while the dolphin is a symbol of their shipping, the owl is a symbol of their stealth. He is the ultimate symbol of covert operations, which is why the CIA and NRO love to use him.
The second image there is from the CIA's recent Instagram page, which they loaded with symbols. They only forgot the Phoenix. But he is displayed prominently in their lobby:
Where O where is the Phoenix? Can you find him? He's peeking over the top of the shield. You will tell me that is an eagle. That is what they want you to think, but that isn't an eagle, it is a phoenix. You will say, “Cmon, that's just the American bald eagle! Everyone knows that.” No, the “eagle”, symbol of the US, was actually based on the the two-headed “eagle” of Prussia and Russia, and that design goes back to Byzantium and Rome. But the confusion is understandable, since Herodotus himself told us of the phoenix, “The plumage is partly red, partly golden, while the general make and size are almost exactly that of the eagle.”
Historically, the “double-eagle” was usually black, and that is because it was really the phoenix, charred by the flames. At that last link to Wikipedia, you will learn the symbol goes back even further, to Mycenae and the Hittites, and that it has always been a symbol of Empire. Since the Phoenicians were behind both the Hittites and the Mycenae, they are just proving my point for me. Eagles don't have two heads, do they? What does? The Phoenix.
There are ways the Mandorla is being used in today's business logos and it has been used in movies, like The Lord of the Rings, the Eye of Sauron..
The Satanic Build Back Better World (B3W) is a deeply satanic concept, used in the Occult for generations..
3 or W or M symbolises the bottom.
33 represents the Vitruvian man.
The dot in the center of the circle represents the anus!
A 3 is a bottom.
If rotated a 3 is an M or a W and interchangeably and so on. Most Germanic auto logos are similarly occultic, satanic, like BMW, which is a rendition of B3W - 833.
B is an 8 which is two threes back to back. 1 is a penis - The lost Penis of Osiris.
Aces and Eights denote Intelligence services scams - false stories like Wild Bill Hickock’s false death - it is their calling card.
It includes Volkswagen, whose logo is also a version of occultist da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man.
Bottom on bottom, 8 or 33 represents the Vitruvian man. The occultist da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man really depicts the buggery of the anterior man by the posterior man, the apex of Satanic Luciferian 33rd Degree masonry or final “Mystery of Mysteries” of the secret societies as explicated by Walter Veith (to open their “Third Eye.”). The reign of the AntiChrist will be marked as the sodomite king of the world..
The Sodomite Gateway - Titanic's Tribute to the Vitruvian Man: From One Leonardo to Another! DiCaprio honors Da Vinci.
One of the iconic scenes from 1997 blockbuster film, Titanic, featured Leonardo DiCaprio at the bow of the ship. Shouting a memorable line, “I'm King of the World,” he held out his arms like a bird catching the wind in its wings. There's an esoteric signal there and some epic irony as well. Note that there are two men at the bow, one behind the other. If you're familiar with the Vitruvian Man you'll recognize this scene as a dramatized version.
Those responsible for the scene understood several things about the classic drawing.
The so-called Vitruvian man is actually two men engaged in sodomy.
By having DiCaprio's character spread his wings, he demonstrates an understanding of the symbolic two headed eagle, another version of the very same sodomite engagement.
By having the character identify himself in this scene as the king of the world, he demonstrates his understanding of the eagle as the Satanic Phoenician Phoenix, the feathered or plumed serpent Amaru, aka Apollo, identities of the coming beast who will reign as the sodomite king of the world.
Note the 33 above the Crown.
Sodomy is the Basis of Hitler’s SS, as I reveal in these Books - Sign Up!
Himmler was also the Head of the Jesuits who, “Give me the child before the age of five, and I will give you the man” - use sodomy to program their minions. Himmler created the Knights of the Holy Sea, Sea Seclorum, the SS, with the Permission of the Pope. He therefore used Sodomy to program the SS officers.
Read the Interview with Marion Knox by Elana Freeland: In the House of the Strong Man, Sodomy is the Key
Fascism and Sodomy moved on into the upper reaches of International Companies..
Samsung's Media Hub branding is a close match. Is it just me, or has Seymour Butts been promoted through the ranks of the design studios lately? :) The Hermes / Mercury mirroring is featured, even repeating in the reflection of the words media hub. M and W forms 33 - bottom on bottom just like Da Vinci's Vitruvian Man. This blue and white variant forms a big H for Horus in the middle, and it dots the “i” in “media” for a big Horus "i." As common to many Mercury symbols, this one is elevated, hovering, as illustrated by the shadow on the orange field under the ball. Remember Doda's hovering stone? This style of the letter m demands we consider it as a numeral 3. OK. 33. Masons again? Probably. Triple helix resurrection, as 3x3=9? Definitely! Are these guys bad to the bone, or what?
Theme - Blue guy nails green guy. United Site Services, Wellmont, EPA
This maker of top quality underwear knows the value of mirrored tridents. You really have to see the Freegun logo as a 33 signal as well as a rotated MW and mirrored MM. The registered trademark directs us to find the bright eye, and there it is in the obfuscated E(Y)E with the reclining H for Horus in the negative space. The brand sets up some cognitive dissonance because some folks buy underwear to kind of keep the movement of the parts in check. Freegun suggests something else entirely. “Free” means, “to set at liberty” “Gun” is slang for a penis.
The sex pictured in logos really isn't there just because juvenile pranksters want to see what they can pull over on us. It's there because the symbols are required to work this ritual magick. The evidence that it works is all around you. If you've never noticed these things, it's because you have been under a spell of delusion. This goes way beyond mis-education. It's supernatural.
We might also connect this Vitruvian Man with the comparable Monas Hieroglyphica of Dr John Dee, who simply identified that king as the sodomizing stick figure with the dot in circle head between the two tower sides of the vagina.
In this, John Dee has taken the Egyptian Symbol of the Ankh and placed a dot in the center of the circle - as the Masons say, "The point from which a Master Mason cannot err"
WORSHIPFUL MASTER ( TO SENIOR WARDEN ) - What is that which is lost ?
SENIOR WARDEN - The genuine secrets of a Master Mason.
WORSHIPFUL MASTER ( TO SENIOR WARDEN ) - How came they lost ?
JUNIOR WARDEN - By the untimely death of our M.HA.
WORSHIPFUL MASTER ( TO SENIOR WARDEN ) - Where do you hope to find them ?
SENIOR WARDEN - With the C.
WORSHIPFUL MASTER ( TO JUNIOR WARDEN ) - What is a C.?
JUNIOR WARDEN - A point within a circle, from which every part of the circumference is equidistant.
WORSHIPFUL MASTER ( TO SENIOR WARDEN ) - Why with a C.?
SENIOR WARDEN - That being a point from which a MM cannot err.
WORSHIPFUL MASTER - We will assist you to repair that loss and may Heaven aid our united endeavours.
IMMEDIATE PAST MASTER - So mote it be.
“...and as you join Freemasonry, initially they'll tell you that their G, the G in the square and compass, means God. But then as you go up through the levels, they'll tell you, 'Oh, this stands for Gnosis, knowledge.' But then when you get higher up it stands for the Generative principle, which means, buggering little boys. And I'm not saying that on my own authority. I spoke with the highest-ranking Freemason to defect to Christianity, Jim Shaw, and um, he was a 33rd degree Freemason, and I had a number of conversations over the phone with him about Freemasonry. And um, you know, I got it from the horse's mouth.” Fritz Springmeier on the Hagmann & Hagmann Report - 10/17/13
The best kept secret of the esoteric grades of Freemasonry is ritual sodomy. They believe it opens the "third eye" to Luciferian illumination. It attacks a pressure point of nerves at the base of the spine, causing temporary neurological paralysis and a shift of consciousness.
MK-ULTRA survivors have testified that sodomy causes identity "splits" in children up to age 5, so it was standard for programming multiples.
In order to produce a mind control slave, it must be done ideally between age two and four. The pressure point causes memory blackout, which is why victims don't experience flashbacks before a physiological change in the brain occurs between age 28 and 32.
When introduced at eleven or older it doesn't cause splits, but initiates the victim or 'neophyte' into the Sado-Masochistic "brotherhood".
The initiation is metaphysical so it doesn't matter whether it is done formally as an initiation, or informally Jerry Sandusky style. The Illuminati are a class of people that have this "illumination" in common whether the perp was a Freemason or not.
Anyone that has experienced sodomy has been illuminated or initiated into the Luciferian initiation because "Lucifer" is real.
During Sodomy A Demon Energy Sexual Addiction Energy Blockage is implanted in the Coccyx, Perineum, Penis. The House of the Strong Man has been broken into and pillaged.
Interview with Marion Knox by Elana Freeland: In the House of the Strong Man, Sodomy is the Key
"The doctors of the law, too, who had come down from Jerusalem, said, ‘He is possessed by Beelzebub’ and ‘He drives out devils by the prince of devils.’ So he called them to come forward, and spoke to them in parables: ‘How can Satan drive out Satan? If a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand; if a household is divided against itself, that house will never stand; and if Satan is in rebellion against himself, he is divided and cannot stand; and that is the end of him.
‘On the other hand, no one can break into a strong man’s house and make off with his goods unless he has first tied the strong man up; then he can ransack the house." (Mark 3:22-27, NE)
"No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation." - David Spangler a Leading figure in the '70's and 80's New Age movement and United Nations affiliated NGO's: Findhorn Foundation, Lindisfarne Association.
This is why sodomy laws have been overturned almost world wide since 1970.
This is why LGBTQPS! S = Satanism P= Pedophilia
The "Titanic" movie title and name of the featured ship harkens to ancient times and the first pantheon of Greek gods and goddesses. That's fitting.
The epic irony I see has to do with how the Titanic is synonymous with disaster and a sign of judgment being brought upon the proud. Acclaimed by some to be “The ship even God couldn't sink,” it did just that, and only 5 days in on its maiden voyage, on April 15, 1912! What we were shown in James Cameron's film was how the one who exulted, “I'm King of the World,” was dethroned, sinking down into the abyss as all degenerated and perverted satanists must sink into the, "Sunken Place". As Titanic fallen angel gods and their offspring in the flood... As the sodomite beast and his worshipers in the lake of fire...
Coming soon, maybe, DiCaprio is to play Russian mystic Grigori Rasputin. There might be some kind of trend here. There's no real future in evil.
The sad rites of ascending in the Club!! All aspects of culture and society have been turned towards this Sodomite direction – for increased online viewing..
..to current sexual mores to acceptance of homosexual marriage.. a world being thoroughly prepped inside out (no pun intended!) VW may also mean the impregnation of one with spread legs, like the Starbucks logo (look for detail in the first logo versions, clearly showing what “she” holds).
Every Sacred Symbol is degenerated, turned upside down in Satanism.
Everything has two or three filthy meanings with these deviants.
The more one contemplates how marinated in evil the entire West has become, and how they openly revel in it, the more one appreciates the ongoing need for the cauterization of Armageddon for True Resets.
The Vatican has a fascination with satanic symbolism that relates to the reproductive organs. As you can see, the obelisk (Baal's shaft or Penis) is within the sun symbol at St. Peters Basilica in Rome.
THIS IS THE KUNDALINI KEY OF ENERGY ENHANCEMENT MEDITATION ACTIVATED BY ENERGY FROM THE CENTER OF THE EARTH KUNDALINI CHAKRA
Masonic Symbolism
The Two Towers Joachim and Boaz and Vesica Piscis represent the Vagina - also the circulation of energy from Heaven to Earth
The eye represents God
The Pentagram the Base Chakra
THE MASONIC EYE IN THE TRIANGLE
THE BASE CHAKRA AND THE CROWN CHAKRAS ARE CONNECTED
STIMULATION OF THE BASE CHAKRA WILL STIMULATE THE HEAD CHAKRAS OPENING THE THIRD EYE
BUT THE SATANIC METHODOLOGY IS TEMPORARY.
ENERGY ENHANCEMENT MEDIATION CONNECTS THE BASE CHAKRA TO KUNDALINI CHAKRA IN THE CENTER OF THE EARTH - PERMANENTLY
FLOODING ENERGY INTO THE CROWN CHAKRA, PERMANENTLY CONNECTING IT TO THE INFINITE ENERGY OF THE CENTRAL SPIRITUAL SUN
ENERGY ENHANCEMENT - THE ULTIMATE WHITE TECHNIQUES FROM ALL THE WORLD'S MOST IMPORTANT PATHS
The Energy Enhancement Kundalini Key contains within it the Origin of all Sacred Symbols - Ancient Egyptian Ankh, Hindu Shivalingam and Yoni, The Sufi Alhambra Fountain, The Christian Cross and many more - SEE BELOW...
Here is the coat of arms of Byzantine Emperor John VIII Palaiologos:
No longer looks like an eagle, does it? Wrong tail, wrong beak. With those phoenix feathers on top of his heads. And who was John? Well, all the Palaiologos Emperors were descended from. . . Komnenes. John was also descended from Savoys, Counts of Flanders. They of course link us forward to King of Italy Victor Emmanuel III, Mussolini's little buddy.
The Indians also have their two-headed phoenix, though they call him the Gandaberunda:
It was used as an avatar of both Shiva and Vishnu. It has long been used by the state of Mysore, telling us what to think of that. Mysore was ruled from 1399 to 1950 by the Wodeyer dynasty. Does that name look familiar? It should. Think of Woden. The dynasty started with Adi Yaduraya, who comes out of nowhere. Yaduraya=Yoda=Woden. It is just an Indianizing of Woden. He was allegedly appointed by Harihara II and ruled Mysore under six emperors. These emperors all have ancestries, but Adi has none. No parents. Since he brought the phoenix with him, we now know where he came from. We can glean the same thing from the fact that while the Vijayanagara Empire was struggling at that time, Mysore was expanding. It was a great center of trade.
From this fact alone, we can also theorize about the so-called Dravidian languages of India, of which Kannada, the language of Mysore, is one. All you have to do is drop the “r” to get Davidian. Do you really think that is a coincidence? If you do, you may wish to study all the similarities between Tamil, Kannada, and Hebrew. It is admitted that ancient Tamil and Kannada are pretty much the same. But the “experts” tell us there is no link between Hebrew and Tamil/Kannada. They pretend not to know where the outside influence came from, even stating at Wikipedia that the influence probably came from within India. You have to laugh. Anyone who studies the question for more than 15 minutes can see they are misdirecting. It soon becomes obvious that the Dravidian languages are showing a Davidian/Hebrew outside influence. They even admit the influence may have come from Tamil merchants. And who do you think those merchants were? Phoenicians/Hebrews/Jews.
So why the misdirection? Because, again, they don't want you to realize that the Phoenicians have been in India almost since the beginning. They didn't start ruling the place only after the British arrived. They had been ruling it long before that. And still are. Above, we have already taken it back to 1400, and with more digging we could take it back much further.
The same can be said for China, though I won't hit that here.
Addendum July 25: While we are looking at the Phoenix again, let's take it back even further:
That's the symbol of the Achaemenids, who ruled Persia from 700-300BC. We studied them in my paper on the Phoenicians, where I showed you they were infiltrated in the time of Darius. We are told that is a falcon, but it is obviously our phoenix again. The three balls are curious, and they remind us of the Medici balls, as well as other balls on other later coats of arms. Those balls have never really been explained, though they may be coins. Money as a symbol of the Phoenicians makes sense, but we should keep our minds open. The Medici balls weren't usually circular, but spherical, and red. Coins were not red or spherical. And why five with the Medicis and three here?† It also reminds us of the solar disks we saw in Egyptian drawings and carvings.
At any rate, we can kill two phoenices with one stone here, since the Achaemenids also seeded the Orontid dynasty of Armenia, starting in about 570BC. That indicates they had been infiltrated by the Phoenicians long before the time of Darius. Supporting evidence for the Phoenician foundation of Armenia is that Aramaic was the language used by the Imperial Court. Aramaic is of course closely related to Hebrew and Phoenician, and the language of early Armenia wasn't Aramaic at all. It was late Phoenician. Scholars simply choose to call late Phoenician Aramaic, so it is just a matter of naming. You are supposed to think the Phoenicians disappeared in 539BC, so there can't be any such thing as late Phoenician. But since the Phoenicians did not disappear, we could simplify the language divisions, and simply tag both Aramaic and Hebrew as late Phoenician. Just as they admit old Hebrew is equivalent to old Phoenician, we can push them both forward together, with later Hebrew the same as later Phoenician. Since the Phoenicians continued to run the Mediterranean after 500BC, all divisions between the Hebrews/Israelites/Canaanites/Phoenicians are manufactured, including most of the language divisions.
Also interesting is that Armenia was originally known as Hayk. That reminds us of the name Hayek, which we can now see as a pointer to Armenia. The mainstream completely misses this, of course, giving the source of the name as Czech or Arabian. Since the Komnenes came from Armenia, this also helps us peg the Hayeks.
And if you still don't think the Phoenicians are the same as the Jews, I will remind you of something I haven't pointed you toward before. Do you remember who is famous for building Solomon's Temple? The Freemasons know, since they still feature him. Hiram I, King of Tyre, built Solomon's Temple. He was Phoenician. The Freemasons will tell you their Hiram was not the King, but just a craftsman in the same event. They do this so that they don't have to mention the Phoenicians, of course. If you mention Hiram the King, people will ask, “King of what?” But if Hiram is introduced in the story as just a craftsman, that question is dodged. See the Wiki page for Hiram Abiff of the Freemason ritual. Although the page does mention Hiram of Tyre, Phoenicia/Phoenician does not appear on the page.
Hiram also built David's Palace in Jerusalem, so Solomon's Temple was not a one-off. Hiram and Solomon were not just trading partners or allies, they were co-heads of the largest trading empire in the world, with Hiram the first name on the heading. The company was Hiram Solomon, not Solomon Hiram. Hiram was building palaces and temples for the Jews, as if he was setting up his in-laws. Why? Because he was. David and Solomon were Phoenicians.
Don't believe me? Let's look at the women. David's mother was Nitzevet, which is a Phoenician name. The Bible is careful not to name her, and her name may have been erased to prevent us recognizing that Nitzevet is not a Twelve Tribes name. Historians also don't want to tell us anything about her, like where she came from. Her husband Jesse is also scrubbed. Although we know his paternal grandparents, we don't know his mother. Solomon's mother was Bathsheba, of course. Her father is given as Eliam of Gilon. Since Gilon is now in Israel, you are supposed to think Eliam and Bathsheba were Israelites. But Gilon is only about six miles east of Acre, and both were north of the southern border of Phoenicia at the time. Acre and Gilon were in Phoenicia. So Bathsheba was Phoenician. Which means Solomon was also Phoenician, by their own rules. To cover this, most maps of this time give the entire region to the Tribe of Asher. Sidon and Tyre are drawn within Asher after 1200BC, based on the Book of Joshua. But this is of course absurd. They admit in other places that Hiram I was King of Tyre, and that Phoenicia was at a zenith in those years. This was during the “Phoenician Renaissance”. So how could Phoenicia be part of Asher? As usual, Phoenicia is just wiped off the map to suit the selective memory of the Jewish historians.
Solomon was succeeded by Rehoboam, and his mother is given as Naamah, admitted to be “a foreigner”. Of course that takes us back to the name Naaman, confirming my analysis there. It looks to me like Naamah/Naaman was a Phoenician name from the beginning, a big clue in all of this. It is also very revealing that they admit Naamah was “a foreigner”. They tell us she was the only foreigner among the top queens of Israel, but as you are seeing that isn't true. I suspect she was a daughter of Hiram. Why? Because it would explain why Hiram was building palaces and temples for Solomon and his family, wouldn't it? They tell us Naamah was from Ammon, but that wouldn't make her a foreigner. Ammon had originally been anything east of the Jordan River, but the western part of it had already been taken over by Israel. It was the subkingdom of Gad, remember. Besides, Ammon itself was not really separate from either Israel or Phoenicia, and they admit that at the time we are speaking of, Shobi, King of Ammon, was simply a vassal of David. Which of course means all of Gad and Ammon were subkingdoms of Israel. So an Ammonite would not have been a foreigner. This looks like more misdirection, to cover the fact that Naamah was a Phoenician.
You will say, “If the Israelites and Phoenicians were really the same people, then Phoenicians weren't foreigners, either. So your argument doesn't follow”. But it does, for two reasons. One, my point is that Naamah isn't admitted to be Phoenician because the historians have to keep the name Phoenicia out of the stories as much as possible. Even when they mention Hiram, they call him King of Tyre, not King of Phoenicia. Which should look strange to you. If he was King of Tyre, he was also King of Phoenicia. But they hope most people won't key on that. Two, I am showing you that although Phoenicians and Israelites had always been closely linked, both being family extensions of the royal house of Egypt, in the time of David they became completely indistinguishable, precisely due to these royal intermarriages between the house of Hiram and the house of David. In fact, this is one way they later hid the Phoenicians. The historians phased the Phoenicians out over the next several centuries, and one of the places they hid them is in the royal lines of Israel. You aren't supposed to realize that after the time of David, the Israelites and the Phoenicians were the same company/country/kingdom.
Remember, this is precisely what the phoenix represents: being born again on the ashes of your parent or predecessor. This is why the descendants of the hidden Phoenicians have used the bird as their primary representation and symbol. You would think it would be a little too obvious—since the name itself gives them away—but as we know these people love to hide in plain sight. They don't think too much of our intelligence, and they have rarely been wrong about that.
The Phoenicians went into a cocoon of their own making—manufactured by their own historians like Herodotus, Thucydides, Plutarch, and Pliny—pretending to be dead. They then rose up on those ashes, having become the Israelites, the Persians, the Greeks, the Mycenaeans, the Minoans, the Armenians, the Macedonians, the Romans, the Carthaginians, and the Byzantines.
Later they became the Mongols, the Vikings, the Goths, the Ottomans, the Franks, the Normans, the Scots, the Stuarts, the Medicis, the Bourbons, the Habsburgs, the Stanleys, the Romanovs, the Sachs, the Kohens, the Goldmans, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Kennedys, and the Vanderbilts. This is why they love name changes so much: every name change is like another cocoon and another phoenix—another rising from the pretend ashes, and another hiding of the past.
*Korben Dallas was Bruce Willis' character in The Fifth Element. Dallas was a Major in Special Forces, telling me the guy behind the moniker may be from a similar background. His Die Hard movie in 1988 had a tower Heist where an explosion of the Tower was supposed to hide the theft of hundreds of millions of dollars of Bearer Bonds. When the Two Towers exploded in 911 2001 One Trillion dollars in Gold, One Trillion dollars in diamonds and One Trillion dollars in bearer bonds disappeared.
Not many people know Willis was born in Idar-Oberstein, Germany. Wikipedia scrubs his mother, giving us no last name. Geni, Geneanet, and even Ethnicelebs also scrub her, meaning they really don't want us to know her maiden name. Given that they admit Willis is a Jacobs, I would guess her name isn't something like Cohen. It would have to be something like Goebbels or Thyssen. She was not just a port in a storm for Willis' father, since he married her and brought her back to the US. She worked in a bank, so she must have known English. On his father's side, Willis is a Parsons, Jacobs, Mumford, Graves, Morris, Sterling and a Webb. The current Queen is a Webb. He also has an ancestor named Pau Pauwiske. Along with Capt. Raleigh Croshaw, she helped found Virginia. His ancestor Capt. Richard Norman also helped found Salem with the Baldwins and Lockwoods. Through them he is related to the Burrs and Ferrises. The Ferrises link us immediately to the Howards, including the Earl of Norfolk. This links us immediately to the Talbots, Stuarts, and FitzAlans of the 16th century. If we keep going back, we hit Henry VII and John of Gaunt. Willis worked at Salem Nuclear Power Plant before becoming an actor. What are the odds, eh? He also worked at Dupont. He was in the first episode of the new Twilight Zone in 1985. Despite having almost no acting experience and no resume, he beat out 3,000 other actors for his part in Moonlighting.
Dallas is also a Jewish name, related to Dulles, Dalz, Dalzer, Dalzell. See my paper on Mussolini for more on that. Korben is also a Jewish name, see Jeremy Corbyn, who pretends not to be Jewish so he can pretend to be anti-Jewish, playing the opposition. So the handle KorbenDallas is another clue in the same direction.
**Tamerlane wasn't Tamerlane, he was Timur-lame, or Timur the Lame. The mainstream now admits this “fiercest warrior” was lame, with a withered hand. He couldn't mount a horse or stay on it without pain, and couldn't hold a weapon. He could barely walk. Since he was otherwise deformed, with one shoulder far lower than the other, these infirmities may not have been due to injury. He had red hair, but supposedly had Mongoloid (East Asian features). Yeah, right. Compare his story to that of Alexander the Great, which I have already unwound. Alexander is also sold to us as a great warrior, tall and hale, when in fact he was short, ugly, and deformed. Timur's story is currently under the care of historian Beatrice Forbes Manz, which should tell you it is the usual fake. Another top historian in that field is Adam Knobler, ditto. That's another Jewish name, a variant of Nobel.
† I think I figured it out. The number is the clue, along with the color. The Medicis had five red balls, plus the blue one on top, which always indicated their “home base”. Well, if we study the Gandaberunda phoenix, we find the same number: six. The phoenix is holding two large elephants in his claws, plus four smaller animals in his mouths. So the balls and animals are representing. . . planets. Only the planets up to Saturn were known until recently, and there are six of them. The Earth is the blue planet, of course, and the others look reddish in the night sky, compared to the stars. There are two large planets and four small ones. So the big elephants represent Jupiter and Saturn.
Satchidanand’s Against Satanism Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Phoenicians, Canaanites, Egyptians, Babilonians, Vickings, Khazarians, Armenians, Ethiopians, ....lots of tribes and old civilizations.... Are we heading to time when America is a historical culture that is no longer exists?
For more than 100 years, the Khazarians told us there is no god...recently, they came out saying that they worship Satan. We must wake up to realize that if the elite who told us there is no god worship Satan, then logically God must exists? Hence, we should go back to worshipping God. Only the New Testament. Just dump the OT.
Phoenicians, Canaanites, Egyptians, Babilonians, Vickings, Khazarians, Armenians, Ethiopians, ....lots of tribes and old civilizations.... Are we heading to time when America is a historical culture that is no longer exists?
For more than 100 years, the Khazarians told us there is no god...recently, they came out saying that they worship Satan. We must wake up to realize that if the elite who told us there is no god worship Satan, then logically God must exists? Hence, we should go back to worshipping God. Only the New Testament. Just dump the OT.